From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar 11 02:01:53 2006
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBE916A572;
	Sat, 11 Mar 2006 02:01:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 365E644B62;
	Fri, 10 Mar 2006 13:39:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no)
Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8242A209E;
	Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:39:26 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Tests: AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO
X-Spam-Learn: ham
X-Spam-Score: -2.4/3.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on tim.des.no
Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180])
	by tim.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A8F2086;
	Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:39:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id B1D5533C31; Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:39:25 +0100 (CET)
From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
References: <200603090133.k291XcfB005631@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20060309090307.GK54826@ip.net.ua>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:39:25 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20060309090307.GK54826@ip.net.ua> (Ruslan Ermilov's message of
	"Thu, 9 Mar 2006 11:03:07 +0200")
Message-ID: <864q262zci.fsf@xps.des.no>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.README
X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree <cvs-src.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-src@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src>,
	<mailto:cvs-src-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 02:01:53 -0000

Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 01:33:38AM +0000, Warner Losh wrote:
> >   Log:
> >   Now that we now spell NO_MAN=3Dxxx MAN=3D, update the docs.
> I object.
>
> 1) This is not common:
>
> grep '^NO_MAN=3D' {bin,usr.bin,sbin,usr.sbin}/*/Makefile |wc -l
>       10
> grep '^MAN=3D[[:space:]]*(#.*)?$' {bin,usr.bin,sbin,usr.sbin}/*/Makefile =
|wc -l
>        0
>
> 2) MAN=3D is worse for performance (with NO_MAN, bsd.man.mk is not
>    processes at all which is faster).
>
> 3) This is in contrast with NO_OBJ and similar knobs.
>
> I can only suggest to make it spell "NO_MAN=3D", i.e., without any value.
>
> Was there some discussion that I've missed?

I was told long ago (shortly after we switched from MAN[1-9] to just
MAN, I believe) that NO_MAN was wrong, and the correct way was to
define MAN to an empty value.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no