From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Apr 28 10: 3:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5996D37B400 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 10:03:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA27847; Sun, 28 Apr 2002 11:01:41 -0600 (MDT) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook may make your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020428110036.0242a590@nospam.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@nospam.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2002 11:01:35 -0600 To: j mckitrick , freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: Can EULA's stop competition from *nix? In-Reply-To: <20020428152837.A29453@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I doubt that terms prohibiting the use of competitive products are enforceable. --Brett At 08:28 AM 4/28/2002, j mckitrick wrote: >Here's a great article a friend sent me: > >http://www.itweek.co.uk/News/1131114 > >Samba outperforms Win2k, and is easier to manage besides. This is, of >course, no major surprise. However, do you think the recent EULA's from >MS will be able to (enforcably) stop Samba and other *nix tools from >competing? > >NOTE: Please CC me, as I am not currently subscribed. Thanks. > >jm >-- >My other computer is your windows box. > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message