From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 25 17:25:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CA4106564A for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:25:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Received: from warped.bluecherry.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:440:eeee:fffb::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80B18FC0A for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:25:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Received: from volatile.chemikals.org (adsl-67-215-2.shv.bellsouth.net [98.67.215.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by warped.bluecherry.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B08AF8004A2A for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:25:50 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (morganw@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by volatile.chemikals.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n3PHPShj047225 for ; Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:25:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from morganw@chemikals.org) Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 12:25:28 -0500 (CDT) From: Wes Morgan To: current@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: COMPAT_FREEBSDn X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 17:25:52 -0000 The various COMPAT_FREEBSDn options are part of generic, but are they needed for most users? Do they enable some structures or interfaces that some userland programs still expect, or is it safe to disable them assuming that I don't need to run binaries from older systems?