From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 5 08:29:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A7B106564A for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2008 08:29:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ss.alert@online.no) Received: from mail46.e.nsc.no (mail46.e.nsc.no [193.213.115.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DFC8FC0A for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2008 08:29:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ss.alert@online.no) Received: from [192.168.1.115] (ti0034a380-0411.bb.online.no [88.88.10.157]) by mail46.nsc.no (8.13.8/8.13.5) with ESMTP id m657OFn7004528 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 5 Jul 2008 09:24:16 +0200 (MEST) Message-Id: From: Sverre Svenningsen To: freebsd-current In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v926) Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2008 09:24:15 +0200 References: <20080703140719.GA72315@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20080703170700.3b91b8c6@peedub.jennejohn.org> <20080703152551.GA73103@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <200807042333.17859.hselasky@c2i.net> <20080704213959.GA1706@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.926) Subject: Re: may I commit this small umodem patch ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 08:29:24 -0000 On Jul 5, 2008, at 02:50 , Xiaofan Chen wrote: > On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 5:39 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: >>> What about flow control? Is flow control required for these devices? >> >> the ones I am talking about don't implement any form of flow control. >> I suppose they would otherwise match the previous check. >> > > They are many of this device and they do not have flow control. > I got two of them right here. One is for NXP LPC-P2148 and the other > is using Microchip PIC18F USB PICs. > > Last time it was discussed here. > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-usb/2008-April/004907.html > > I've tried the lpcusb based generic CDC-ACM device under > Linux/Windows/NetBSD successfully but not FreeBSD. > > Xiaofan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > > Is current@freebsd.org just an alias to freebsd-current@freebsd.org ? I keep getting duplicates of every message belongin to this discussion... Just thought i'd ask so the next guy replying can remove the dupe address from the CC field :) -Sverre