From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 31 17:13:02 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6158616A531 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:13:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89CFA13C480 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:13:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 2168 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2007 20:12:33 +0300 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 31 Oct 2007 20:12:33 +0300 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.44, engine: 4.44.0.09170, virus records: 253097, updated: 31.10.2007] Message-ID: <0fbb01c81be1$37e698f0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 20:12:28 +0300 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="koi8-r"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Subject: BIO_FLUSH on twe driver. Why is it not there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:13:02 -0000 7-BETA1 gjournal complained that BIO_FLUSH is not supported by the driver. That is twe driver. However, twe is working via scsi subsystem and the authour of gjournal said somewhere that he has had implemeneted BIO_FLISH for scsi and he specifically mentioned that he has tested twe and twa and they both support BIO_FLUSH. Then why BIO_FLISH is not supported now? -- Regards, Artem