From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 30 05:54:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2ABF1065672 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sfourman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f195.google.com (mail-yx0-f195.google.com [209.85.210.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACA9A8FC0C for ; Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:54:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe33 with SMTP id 33so858844yxe.7 for ; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:54:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=435lWk2ncmoNzAurjELB+ZF4/3aIJgydctWDSuk8d9U=; b=P2QemJNvin2rE0jWMoXWV0uzswR6QBBTpDQ6J3gTVx25pfaFLsS0Q9GSTU0P3eOQ1B 2tuKRCFoWhOlX9UP9eq1/ZgT0nl7KqgZ7Ktw7ojt12Utz/+6JqLuG2cplr5JkUn0esLx XDPH9h7qqyAgZSqsq0VBujkgUCyeLtTr3tsmQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=yA1OlNHHThkF+rOAGwjtlaxpPdCGrSowavY8WFIaZbVKl1XAD9wMpYATR91JRK4FKG vANbnKooc7/u0knvF6ZOr4y6mkxT1aul3Uu2F+td5bcpd39/vhLiDiCTlR0LetQ9h8Zj py0hbx20p3IH21WFoGH3vg4mTWIQWJpqVb6tw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.237.3 with SMTP id k3mr5977632ybh.70.1251611651146; Sat, 29 Aug 2009 22:54:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <77abe410908211256g44dd20d8o9b50c20357e63a6b@mail.gmail.com> <4A98DFF6.4060404@prgmr.com> Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 00:54:11 -0500 Message-ID: <11167f520908292254p9e5bcam3411ba3c0160df62@mail.gmail.com> From: "Sam Fourman Jr." To: Luke S Crawford Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: finishing up the xen port - would funding help? X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 05:54:12 -0000 > what about the tap: driver and friends? qcow:? (these are issues > I will need to figure out) LVM snapshots are so slow that I find them > unsuable, so I'm not really losing much by moving to the tap: driver > (granted, I am pushing my disks to the limit. lvm snapshots work fine if > your disks are lightly loaded and/or faster than mine.) If I can ask, how does Prgmr.com allocate disk space to domu's? qcow? also does anyone know if a NetBSD 5 or CURRENT dom0 can migrate domu's between 2 NetBSD Dom0's ? Migration and ZFS is what I am waiting for NetBSD to have. Sam Fourman Jr.