From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 7 17:46:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA2D106566C; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:46:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98908FC0A; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 17:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp6 with SMTP id 6so148323ywp.13 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:46:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=w0lbyBQoKku/7XeUaqXXog0XzZJF19nJb1DSeHTva2Y=; b=j3tS7Erx1GJQBZlsRQam+AmD7Y4PWEtjT8ImQ0UnIqKfqzw1Mhtv0fsSer9tuhQRf9 gAv/NN7ZAzfI/rhScBFBEIa6y4Xab60ryzdzv3/R+Ag666u9ED6Lo9UL49TkWTqEYkAD 0o2LkZ8dYIxsD7MaUSS1/82WZMHZ18iH8HatI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=f+s0Y3IwNihqPaYRj9eC3pBRvaNCs5gSeHgj72ozpGWwPGk7CjbHe5GwQ+nVl5AmTh aFNW7AgR12IGCnkv+8VT/Hft2qP7J4Yb+py5gSv7t/7YfPSpfpfdpqm+mgNyejgxlnAq ElvkMkIkGBSdK6t97hnGw3leYLTLCKTToYquE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.47.17 with SMTP id z17mr2345468ybj.43.1291743993020; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 09:46:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.147.124.9 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:46:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201012070933.13710.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <07255796.20101207031807@bitdefender.com> <201012070933.13710.jhb@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 09:46:32 -0800 Message-ID: From: Jack Vogel To: John Baldwin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Mihai-Catalin Salgau Subject: Re: vlan limits on e1000? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 17:46:35 -0000 Same thing I was thinking, there is nothing else that should limit vlans in any way. Jack On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 6:33 AM, John Baldwin wrote: > On Monday, December 06, 2010 8:18:07 pm Mihai-Catalin Salgau wrote: > > Hello Freebsd-net, > > > > I have two dual port NICs, one Broadcom(bce0,bce1) and one > Intel(em0,em1), on FreeBSD 8-stable > > (about two weeks old) with a DHCP server running. > > I've been successfully using a large number of vlans over bce1,em0 and > em1 with iSCSI, > > but wanted to switch to AoE(ata over ethernet). I've set vlandevs by > round-robin, and got > > vlan1 on bce0, vlan2 on em0, vlan3 on em1, vlan4 on bce0....vlan12 on > em1. I've binded > > net/vblade instances to each interface, but the problem I'm facing now > is that while > > vlans 1-10 are working properly, vlans 11 and 12 won't see any traffic > unless the interface is > > in promiscuous mode. I noticed that while trying to attach tcpdump and > saw the thing instantly work. > > I've had no problems with iSCSI over the same setup, and dhcp packets > are getting trough properly. > > I've moved those last two vlans to bce0 and they work ok, but I'm a bit > locked on why this is happening. > > Are there any known limitations on vlans on e1000? > > Are you using the 'vlanhwfilter' feature? > > -- > John Baldwin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >