From owner-freebsd-ports Fri May 19 0:38:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from maynard.mail.mindspring.net (maynard.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.243]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CEE737BD00 for ; Fri, 19 May 2000 00:38:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca13-107.ix.netcom.com [209.109.238.107]) by maynard.mail.mindspring.net (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA16538; Fri, 19 May 2000 03:38:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.9.3/8.6.9) id AAA58347; Fri, 19 May 2000 00:37:51 -0700 (PDT) To: Will Andrews Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: X11 issues (XFree86-libs port uploaded) References: <20000514151256.N82488@argon.blackdawn.com> From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Date: 19 May 2000 00:37:42 -0700 In-Reply-To: Will Andrews's message of "Sun, 14 May 2000 15:12:56 -0400" Message-ID: Lines: 9 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * From: Will Andrews * The port has me wondering about breaking up the X11 build into various * parts and using the current x11/XFree86 as a psuedo-port. For example, we I've been working with Taguchi-san on this. It should be ready for commit pretty soon. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message