From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 15 18:06:34 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FCB37B401
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vista.netmemetic.com (bb-203-125-42-79.singnet.com.sg
	[203.125.42.79])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DAE43F93
	for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 15 Jul 2003 18:06:33 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ngps@netmemetic.com)
Received: by vista.netmemetic.com (Postfix, from userid 100)
	id EF7BC7F1; Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:09:09 +0800 (SGT)
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:09:09 +0800
From: Ng Pheng Siong <ngps@netmemetic.com>
To: Nicholas Esborn <nick@netdot.net>
Message-ID: <20030716010909.GD832@vista.netmemetic.com>
References:
	<8213881.1058211676830.JavaMail.nobody@beaker.psp.pas.earthlink.net>
	<20030714211518.GD4973@garage.freebsd.pl> <3F13A975.7020508@geminix.org>
	<20030715161909.GA6394@carbon.berkeley.netdot.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030715161909.GA6394@carbon.berkeley.netdot.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
cc: "V. Jones" <vjones62@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: jails, ipfilter & stunnel
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Security issues [members-only posting]
	<freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>,
	<mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 01:06:34 -0000

On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:19:09AM -0700, Nicholas Esborn wrote:
> Would it be useful to create multiple IP aliases on lo0, i.e. 127.0.0.2,
> 127.0.0.3, bind the jails to those, then use ipfw, ipf/ipnat, or a TCP
> proxy to connect ports on the server's real IP to services bound to the
> lo0 aliases?

Yup, I do that on some of my machines. Mostly works. Easy to experiment
with, too.


-- 
Ng Pheng Siong <ngps@netmemetic.com> 

http://firewall.rulemaker.net  -+- Manage Your Firewall Rulebase Changes
http://www.post1.com/home/ngps -+- Open Source Python Crypto & SSL