From owner-freebsd-security Sat Oct 7 18: 3:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0557437B503; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 18:03:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA99935; Sat, 7 Oct 2000 21:01:51 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 21:01:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200010080101.VAA99935@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Kris Kennaway Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Stable branch In-Reply-To: <20001007165322.A17115@citusc17.usc.edu> References: <4.3.2.20001007161924.00b72460@207.227.119.2> <20001007165322.A17115@citusc17.usc.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: > I have no idea of the impact it would have on CVS though - Peter? The cvsup servers get put through hell whenever any tag is laid down, but I would be astonished if they got hammered any worse for two tags than they currently do for one. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message