From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 12 00:58:42 2005
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1C05116A4CE; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:58:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org
	(CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BF7FF43D55; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:58:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id ABEC9514D6; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:58:36 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:58:36 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>
Message-ID: <20050412005836.GA97280@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <425A32C8.30080.1710F6F5@localhost> <425AB7E0.2030101@FreeBSD.org>
	<425ACDFB.1080102@freebsd.org> <200504112221.40084.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
	<425B1368.4060903@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="KsGdsel6WgEHnImy"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <425B1368.4060903@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl
	Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabext
X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree <cvs-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-ports>,
	<mailto:cvs-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:58:42 -0000


--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 05:16:40PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Michael Nottebrock wrote:
> >On Monday, 11. April 2005 21:20, Doug Barton wrote:
> >
> >>Adam Weinberger wrote:
> >>
> >>>I believe emphatically that the sanity tests should be non-optional.
> >>
> >>And I believe emphatically the opposite. And your comment about the
> >>procmail filter is totally unsuitable for those who pay for their=20
> >>bandwidth
> >>by the byte. The more burdens you add to ports maintainers the fewer of
> >>them we will be able to attract.
> >
> >
> >Note that the automatic mails people are discussing here would be sent t=
o=20
> >the *committer*, not the maintainer - and as a ports-committer, you pret=
ty=20
> >much have opted in to receive (and read, too!) all sorts of mails=20
> >regarding your work when you accepted the commit bit. It's a punishment=
=20
> >after all.
>=20
> Thank you for clarifying this. You've now given me yet another reason to=
=20
> not ever pick up and commit a PR for a new port.

If you're not willing to deal with followup emails requiring you to
fix the submission to work in other environments than the one you
tested, then yes, this is a good thing.  That's part of your job.

Kris

--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCWx08Wry0BWjoQKURAj8sAKDoXOaJBj2UWwVY9yuCCG2mFmPvdACgwHj+
3aG4zP6/HD48wwnqtj6hc6s=
=hz26
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--KsGdsel6WgEHnImy--