From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 05:17:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76A81065672 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 05:17:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from glenbarber.us (onyx.glenbarber.us [199.48.134.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 673828FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 05:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95181 invoked by uid 0); 26 Feb 2012 00:17:43 -0500 Received: from unknown (HELO glenbarber.us) (76.124.49.145) by 0 with SMTP; 26 Feb 2012 00:17:43 -0500 Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:17:38 -0500 From: Glen Barber To: Super Bisquit Message-ID: <20120226051738.GA2118@glenbarber.us> References: <20120226044459.GA1338@glenbarber.us> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-current Subject: Re: PEBKAC X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 05:17:45 -0000 On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:09:47AM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote: > On 2/25/12, Glen Barber wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:23:10PM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote: > >> Machine: PowerPC 7445 Kernel 9.0 > >> I've used. Entered "env -i" stated as prefix to "make buildkernel > >> KERNCONF=$VERSION" command. > >> > >> Kernel build stops with following immediate error: > >> "ERROR: version of config(8) does not match kernel! > >> config version = 600007, version required = 600010. > >> > >> Okay. Now I've looked at the standard-supfile and notice that the tag > >> is at RELENG=8. > >> > >> Now, if I change this to tag=RELENG_10- and I've already asked for > >> where the 10.0 sources are with no replies- will the system crap out > >> on me? > > > > I don't know about PPC-specific stuff, but the tag should be "tag=." for > > HEAD (aka, 10-CURRENT). > > > > Okay, > Will I need to restate all as "10_CURRENT" for the > kernel(standard)-supfile or should I use the cvs-supfile as the > template with 10.0_CURRENT as the tag? > I'm not entirely sure I understand your question. You should not sepecify 10-anything in supfiles for HEAD - 10-anything doesn't exist. For HEAD, you want to use "." as the tag. Glen