From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Nov  8 23:53:33 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za (zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za [146.64.24.58])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1270B14D51; Mon,  8 Nov 1999 23:53:23 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jhay@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za)
Received: (from jhay@localhost)
	by zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA89881;
	Tue, 9 Nov 1999 09:52:46 +0200 (SAT)
	(envelope-from jhay)
From: John Hay <jhay@mikom.csir.co.za>
Message-Id: <199911090752.JAA89881@zibbi.mikom.csir.co.za>
Subject: Re: Should jail treat ip-number?
In-Reply-To: <21882.942127517@critter.freebsd.dk> from Poul-Henning Kamp at "Nov 9, 1999 07:05:17 am"
To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp)
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 1999 09:52:45 +0200 (SAT)
Cc: shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp (Yoshinobu Inoue),
	freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> >
> >I have some concern about jail, and would like to discuss them.
> >
> >Currentlly jail set an ip-number and let prisoned processes
> >only to bind it.
> >My concerns are,
> >
> >(1)When IPv6 is added to the system, more general id would be
> >   desirable.
> 
> I agree, *IF* IPv6 ever becomes a reality, we will look at this.

So when will you consider that it became a reality? :-) Or am I just
dreaming that some operating systems and routers ship with IPv6 and
that IANA, ARIN, APNIC and RIPE are dishing out IPv6 addresses and
that we are in the process of getting Kame integrated into FreeBSD? :-)

John
-- 
John Hay -- John.Hay@mikom.csir.co.za


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message