From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jul 1 13:38:24 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA07251 for current-outgoing; Mon, 1 Jul 1996 13:38:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from main.statsci.com ([198.145.127.110]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA07207 for ; Mon, 1 Jul 1996 13:37:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from statsci.com by main.statsci.com with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #3) id m0uapcv-00060BC; Mon, 1 Jul 96 13:31 PDT Message-Id: X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: "Andrew V. Stesin" , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem installing from 2.2-960612-SNAP References: <29295.836209428@time.cdrom.com> In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 01 Jul 1996 01:23:48 -0700." <29295.836209428@time.cdrom.com> Reply-to: scott@statsci.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 01 Jul 1996 13:31:21 -0700 From: Scott Blachowicz Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: > > _if_ you originally had all disk devoted to DOS, > > > > _and_ you used FIPS later to repartition your disk and > > free some space for FreeBSD at the end, ...and mine was one such system. :-( > Yes, this theory has come up before. The only problem, of course, > is that it still doesn't help us fix msdosfs. :-) Well...I think I've heard Robert (Nordier?) espousing the theory, so I guess the msdosfs rewrite/fix will account for that theory. Scott Blachowicz Ph: 206/283-8802x240 Mathsoft (Data Analysis Products Div) 1700 Westlake Ave N #500 scott@statsci.com Seattle, WA USA 98109 Scott.Blachowicz@seaslug.org