From owner-freebsd-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 11 13:16:04 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815CF16A41B for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:16:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) Received: from casselton.net (casselton.net [63.165.140.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 429FB13C43E for ; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:16:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) Received: from casselton.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by casselton.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l9BDG2cn093156; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:16:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tinguely@casselton.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=casselton.net; s=ccnMail; t=1192108562; bh=AvfYax3CVHyrp8S2a+Pj90IWLHNQq4rM8fJFRw9 FGnM=; h=Date:From:Message-Id:To:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To; b=iLM7nOOx F/kkZiQne4t23jI6W7oCx74tKvO4HwieWBC5OGcQtVMHqd2fYmhNseEIUG5tyVteQd7 2YGwuNlBovTkXNEwBT7AGtWFfrEAqHJ3DG45p2yMBLsOyzLJIfPa7BO19ne7yRWvlz+ dMGUO62pkjrajnmlXDLMo3+sn0tGo= Received: (from tinguely@localhost) by casselton.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l9BDG2LZ093155; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:16:02 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from tinguely) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 08:16:02 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Tinguely Message-Id: <200710111316.l9BDG2LZ093155@casselton.net> To: achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com, tinguely@casselton.net In-Reply-To: <200710111237.57114.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Zoneminder and multichannel cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:16:04 -0000 > Just a question, in context with our previous discussions. > I managed to capture video from more than 1 camera, in zoneminder. > I'd like to ask, whats the theoritical max fps for each of 4 cameras using the > bktr driver in its FreeBSD-6.2 state? > In my code, with METEOR_CAP_CONTINOUS (single camera) it can do > > (as ZM reports) 25 fps (which AFAIK is good), whereas with all 4 cameras > and by using METEOR_CAP_SINGLE, the fps drop down to 2.5 fps/camera. You are getting 25fps (PAL/SECAM?) with free-running captures, and 10 fps when your capture switches and single captures. That sounds about right. I don't know the input switching speed. Also, the video inputs of the different cameras are not going to aligned to each other and also not aligned to the program that calls the METEOR_CAP_SINGLE. I would expect that every capture will have to wait for the start of a new video frame. --Mark.