From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Nov 17 18: 0:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1057D37B401 for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 18:00:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53AD43E6E for ; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 18:00:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [64.49.215.141]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B988A1AF2; Sun, 17 Nov 2002 22:00:06 -0400 (AST) Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 22:00:06 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Anthony Atkielski Cc: FreeBSD Chat Subject: Re: FreeBSD: Server or Desktop OS? In-Reply-To: <064801c28ea3$bc9574c0$0a00000a@atkielski.com> Message-ID: <20021117215730.W23359-100000@hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 18 Nov 2002, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Marc writes: > > > Then, those ppl shouldn't be MFC'ng code down > > into stable if they aren't willing to be > > responsible for problems that such causes ... > > My understanding is that the people who work on FreeBSD are not paid to > do so. If this is so, there is really no justification for complaint. > Beggars can't be choosers. So, you are saying we should sit quietly back and accept the instabilities? Man, will that ever get FreeBSD into the corporate IT departments ... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message