From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Dec 30 08:37:18 1996 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id IAA04887 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 30 Dec 1996 08:37:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from haywire.DIALix.COM (news@haywire.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.65]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id IAA04826 for ; Mon, 30 Dec 1996 08:36:59 -0800 (PST) Received: (from news@localhost) by haywire.DIALix.COM (8.8.4/8.8.2) id AAA11258 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Tue, 31 Dec 1996 00:36:41 +0800 (WST) X-Authentication-Warning: haywire.DIALix.COM: news set sender to usenet-request@haywire.dialix.com using -f Received: from GATEWAY by haywire.DIALix.COM with netnews for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org (problems to: usenet@haywire.dialix.com) To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Date: 30 Dec 1996 16:36:40 GMT From: peter@spinner.DIALix.COM (Peter Wemm) Message-ID: <5a8r2o$a7e$1@haywire.DIALix.COM> Organization: DIALix Services, Perth, Australia. References: <199612230950.KAA02236@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: mailing list archives Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In article <199612231911.LAA16876@freefall.freebsd.org>, jmb@freefall.freebsd.org (Jonathan M. Bresler) writes: > J Wunsch wrote: >> >> As a compromise (until we've got your database): what about daily >> archives? Even for the most bloat^H^H^H^H^Hpopulated lists, they are >> not more than a few hundred KB per day. This should be small enough >> to make it still manageable. > > can we use glimpse? (did not follow the recent thread) > i can break the archives into daily files (hackers-19961223) > > how large are glimpse index fiels (or what ever they use) If the way exmh used it to do fast searches on it's one-message-per-file folder system is any guide, it's between 5 and 10% of the original size. If you want to see something that I like (so far), have a look at: http://www.cineca.it/proxy/search/ It uses something called "swish" to do the searching from what I can see in the html source, and hypermail to manage it. This may be fine for www access, but I don't know if it's useful at all in text mode. > jmb -Peter