Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 1 Oct 1995 17:15:06 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        taob@io.org (Brian Tao)
Cc:        terry@lambert.org, kaleb@x.org, hackers@freefall.freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: /bin/sh thinks it's csh
Message-ID:  <199510020015.RAA20655@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.951001162527.19034X-100000@trepan.io.org> from "Brian Tao" at Oct 1, 95 04:27:01 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>     So argv[0] is the name of the command ("echo") and argv[1] (or $1)
> is the first argument, which is "foo".  Why is it proper for POSIX sh
> to return the second argument, "bar"?  Is "foo" considered the command
> name in the above case?

echo is a builtin.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199510020015.RAA20655>