From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 16 20:51:31 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FFF16A418; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from mail.bitblocks.com (ns1.bitblocks.com [64.142.15.60]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD5C13C43E; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bakul@bitblocks.com) Received: from bitblocks.com (localhost.bitblocks.com [127.0.0.1]) by mail.bitblocks.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C4F5B2E; Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:22:00 -0800 (PST) To: Hiroki Sato In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:59:55 +0900." <20071216.225955.111308887.hrs@allbsd.org> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 12:21:59 -0800 From: Bakul Shah Message-Id: <20071216202200.51C4F5B2E@mail.bitblocks.com> Cc: albert.shih@obspm.fr, dougb@FreeBSD.org, nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: TeTeX and TeXLive X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 20:51:31 -0000 Why not add TeXLive port even as it is, so that people can play with it? As for modularization, I hope you don't go the extreme of a zillion little pieces but instead break it in a few pieces to cover about 90% of the use(rs). More pieces means more things can go wrong.... [just my opinion]