From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 20 11:28:01 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3975916A468 for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:28:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from om-lists-bsd@omx.ch) Received: from omega.omnis.ch (omega.omnis.ch [195.134.143.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87E9213C45D for ; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:28:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from om-lists-bsd@omx.ch) Received: (qmail 32473 invoked from network); 20 Jun 2007 11:13:38 -0000 Received: from bigapple.omnis.ch ([195.134.148.35]) by omega.omnis.ch ([195.134.143.43]) with ESMTP via TCP; 20 Jun 2007 11:13:38 -0000 From: Olivier Mueller To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 13:13:38 +0200 Message-Id: <1182338018.10483.27.camel@bigapple.omnis.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: ZFS status now in June? / stable enough for a file server? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 11:28:01 -0000 Hello, I have to setup a file storage server (non-critcal, just as secondary backup server) and I am wondering if would be a realistic idea to start using ZFS. I spent some time browsing the lists and newsgroups, and the status wiki page looks "good": http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFS . The http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html page also states: June 2007 Start FreeBSD 7.0 Release Process, so this may also be a positive point about overall stability? :) It would be to store lots of data, and the FS-compression feature of ZFS would be quite interesting for this server. Of course I'd be glad to help debugging any issues I may see. So if you are already using ZFS in "pre-production", I would be glad for a short "go/no go" feedback, thanks :-) regards, Olivier