Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 19:43:58 +0100 From: void <void@f-m.fm> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dis/advantages of compiling in-kernel over kldload Message-ID: <ZK70boJDN8WxNf0V@int21h> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfrTSTaKYjtXqqCrKnyw3j1QPPSkPaj0L3Y=JwHO%2BS-VWA@mail.gmail.com> References: <ZK7mnohS12eEYoV2@int21h> <CANCZdfo1z9xq2%2BZNoYmudxkrR9=c_9Eg9NOECKU8kwgoGi7pbA@mail.gmail.com> <ZK7pqlDKY4JBkvek@int21h> <CANCZdfqYSgGMT=JE8h16n0zVYbrWYYgggJwsJK4Z2QFoE8Es4g@mail.gmail.com> <ZK7u00XORTTe-2kK@int21h> <CANCZdfrTSTaKYjtXqqCrKnyw3j1QPPSkPaj0L3Y=JwHO%2BS-VWA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 12:24:45PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: >Depends. If you build everything, then you get "tied" modules that are only >for a specific kernel. If you run the released modules, then there can be a >small performance hit that don't matter too much unless you are out of >CPU.... the release modules withh work with a range of kernels. ok that's fine, thanks for the clarification. --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZK70boJDN8WxNf0V>