From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 25 19:46:10 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66FF16A400; Fri, 25 May 2007 19:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B18213C4C5; Fri, 25 May 2007 19:46:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu) Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30]) by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l4PJk9Xu005200 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 25 May 2007 15:46:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from gallatin@localhost) by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id l4PJjfxC022952; Fri, 25 May 2007 15:45:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from gallatin) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 15:45:41 -0400 From: Andrew Gallatin To: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20070525154540.A22931@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> References: <200705251938.l4PJcWRY007635@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200705251938.l4PJcWRY007635@repoman.freebsd.org>; from gallatin@FreeBSD.org on Fri, May 25, 2007 at 07:38:09PM +0000 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.9-RELEASE-p1 on an i386 Cc: Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/mxge if_mxge.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 19:46:10 -0000 Andrew Gallatin [gallatin@FreeBSD.org] wrote: > gallatin 2007-05-25 19:38:32 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/dev/mxge if_mxge.c > Log: > - Use m_getcl() rather than m_getjcl() when we're allocating 2KB > clusters. This helps quite a bit on my low end machines (improves > performance by about 300Kpps when being blasted by a hardware > packet generator). BTW, thanks to bmilekic for reminding me of the packet zone. It would be nice if such a thing existed for the jumbo sized clusters :) Drew