From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 3 00:25:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FFA106564A for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 00:25:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-jnhn.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 620548FC0C for ; Sat, 3 Sep 2011 00:25:06 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqAEAKByYU6DaFvO/2dsb2JhbABCFoQ3pRaBRgEBAQEDAQEBICsgCxkCDgoCAg0ZAiMGAQkmBggHBAEcBIdWpguRZoEshC2BEQSRGoISiXyHLQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,321,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="136402294" Received: from erie.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.206]) by esa-jnhn-pri.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 02 Sep 2011 20:25:05 -0400 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9942DB3F03; Fri, 2 Sep 2011 20:25:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2011 20:25:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem To: Brandon Gooch Message-ID: <1678816683.746981.1315009505581.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Originating-IP: [172.17.91.202] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.10_GA_2692 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/6.0.10_GA_2692) Cc: FreeBSD-Current Subject: Re: newnfs user setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2011 00:25:06 -0000 Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Brandon Gooch > wrote: > > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 8:09 AM, Rick Macklem > > wrote: > >>> On Thu, 26 May 2011, Rick Macklem wrote: > >>> ... > >>> > =C2=A0http://people.freebsd.org/~rmacklem/dtrace.patch > >>> > > >>> Hmm. Is it just me? > >>> Trying to test the patch I get: > >>> > >>> (fs)(root) patch -C < dtrace.patch > >>> Hmm... I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere. > >>> > >> Here's how I apply the patch. > >> - download dtrace.patch to somewhere, lets say /tmp, then > >> # cd /usr/src/sys <-- sys subdirectory of a current head, > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 which you don't mind messing up > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 doesn't have to be at /usr/src/sys, > >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 of course. > >> # patch -p1 < /tmp/dtrace.patch > >> > >> rick > >> > > > > What's the status on this patch? It would be nice to get > > dtrace/newnfs > > going for 9.0...it's not too late, right? > > > > I'll test the patch too BTW :) > > > > -Brandon > > >=20 > So it looks like the patch was committed to HEAD, but the bits to > support the New NFS implementation were never flipped on -- is that > for a good reason? >=20 I know nothing about Dtrace, so if something needs to be changed/fixed, someone who understands these things will have to let me know. When I built a kernel with "options KDTRACE_HOOKS" and set dtraceall_load=3D"YES" in /etc/rc.conf, it booted and # dtrace -l - seemed to find the stuff (it's called "dtnfscl", btw). Someone told me that's how you check it's loaded and that's all I know how to do w.r.t. dtrace. If you can test/debug it, that would be great, rick > -Brandon > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"