From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr  6 12:55:16 2015
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id 9BAEE1B9; Mon,  6 Apr 2015 12:55:16 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2015 12:55:16 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Don Lewis <truckman@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r383422 - head/devel/protobuf-c
Message-ID: <20150406125516.GA52241@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201504061251.t36CpbmW013331@svn.freebsd.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201504061251.t36CpbmW013331@svn.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2015 12:55:16 -0000

On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 12:51:37PM +0000, Don Lewis wrote:
> New Revision: 383422
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/383422
> 
> [...]
> -PORTNAME=	protobuf-c
> -PORTVERSION=	1.1.0
> -CATEGORIES=	devel
> -MASTER_SITES=	https://github.com/${PORTNAME}/${PORTNAME}/releases/download/v${PORTVERSION}/ \
> -		LOCAL/truckman/farsight
> +PORTNAME=		protobuf-c
> +PORTVERSION=		1.1.0
> +DISTVERSIONPREFIX=	v
> +CATEGORIES=		devel

Any reason to break indentation in PORTNAME section?  I understand the
ugliness of DISTVERSIONPREFIX, but it alone does not warrant repo churn
in the adjacent lines (think "svn blame").

./danfe