From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 21:32:57 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4CB16A41A for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:32:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB67E13C467 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 21:32:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 8150 invoked by uid 399); 9 Dec 2007 21:06:16 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO lap.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTP; 9 Dec 2007 21:06:16 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <475C58C6.8010503@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:06:14 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Simon L. Nielsen" References: <200712090548.lB95mnwF010235@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071209164338.GM1370@zaphod.nitro.dk> In-Reply-To: <20071209164338.GM1370@zaphod.nitro.dk> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/snapshots index.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:32:57 -0000 Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > [re@ bcc'ed as FYI, without getting their mailbox flooded more than > needed] > > On 2007.12.09 05:48:49 +0000, Doug Barton wrote: >> dougb 2007-12-09 05:48:49 UTC >> >> FreeBSD doc repository >> >> Modified files: >> en/snapshots index.sgml >> Log: >> The June snapshots are gone, long live the December snapshots! > > Hmm, instead of always playing catch-up with this, how about not > listing them directly but just pointing people at the directory > structure to check themself? Adding this manually doesn't seem to buy > us much other than a page which is often stale IMO... I have no dog in this hunt, I'm just trying to help keep what we have now up to date. I'll let you take your suggestion up with the release engineers. :) Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection