From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Dec 16 19:46:20 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA27625
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 19:46:20 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA27620
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 19:46:19 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from julian@whistle.com)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA11621;
	Wed, 16 Dec 1998 19:44:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22)
 via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpdU11619; Thu Dec 17 03:44:17 1998
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 19:44:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
To: Brian Feldman <green@unixhelp.org>
cc: "Richard Seaman, Jr." <lists@tar.com>, Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com>,
        "current@FreeBSD.ORG" <current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Linux Threads patches available
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812162226190.19075-100000@janus.syracuse.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.981216194225.1418A-100000@current1.whistle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

sounds like you have a good reason..

pitty..

 I didn't see the 4KB malloc you mentionned in
the other email added in the patches..  I guess I must have missed it.. 
I'll look again


On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Brian Feldman wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Dec 1998, Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> > Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote:
> > > 
> > > On Tue, 15 Dec 1998 15:57:35 -0800 (PST), Archie Cobbs wrote:
> > > 
> > [patches described]
> > 
> > The kernel components of this are very self contained and will not 
> > jeapardise other sytem code..
> > I would like to extract them and check them in to assist testing, and 
> > to make such things as star-office 3.0 to run "out of the box"
> > 
> > Anyone have any objections?
> > 
> > julian
> 
> For one, I object. Keep it as a patchset, or make a vendor branch, but
> the overhead and memory use of these modifications needs to be considered
> carefully! I know I did much of the LinuxThreads work, and would love to see
> it going into the kernel, but the ramifications need to be examined.
> 
> > >
> > 
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> > 
> 
>  Brian Feldman						  _ __  ___ ___ ___  
>  green@unixhelp.org				      _ __ ___ | _ ) __|   \ 
> 		      http://www.freebsd.org/	 _ __ ___ ____ | _ \__ \ |) |
>  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!		   _ __ ___ ____ _____ |___/___/___/ 
> 
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message