From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 17 20:34:34 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BED516A4CE
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:34:34 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.204])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5BC43D54
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:34:33 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sander.vesik@gmail.com)
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j1so380345rnf
	for <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:34:32 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
	s=beta; d=gmail.com;
	h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references;
	b=d2nGsk7Z3agavy6AyaTj9ZqwBlBjr0QRESVATfhlv16XPS/7nPE/DY5Z1IipKY3g/8OLm54q+i9CuBBT9ZZjnIbMV0p5HO3HZcRXyPFpupORTT9xqs3NjZfQIRCQdEAo1ER7DraVqLaSa4vSavSWIfcPWp8NfL1MVfEWM0TVmCw=
Received: by 10.38.164.58 with SMTP id m58mr208732rne;
        Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:34:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.38.66.46 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:34:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <dcb2c27a050217123424ed0d84@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:34:32 +0200
From: Sander Vesik <sander.vesik@gmail.com>
To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.org>
In-Reply-To: <200502171233.j1HCXMRI036090@fire.jhs.private>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
References: <thomas.leveille@gmail.com>
	 <a83b4fdf05021702151ae8b384@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200502171233.j1HCXMRI036090@fire.jhs.private>
cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Assuming We Want FreeBSD to Grow: Who Is It For?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Sander Vesik <sander.vesik@gmail.com>
List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism <freebsd-advocacy.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>,
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-advocacy>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy>,
	<mailto:freebsd-advocacy-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:34:34 -0000

On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:33:22 +0100, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.org> wrote:
> 
> Much hot air on advocacy@ does not qualify.  Let's
>         - Tell people to move to chat@freebsd.org.
>         - Report offenders to postmaster@freebsd.org for blocking.
>         - Request postmaster@freebsd.org appends to list definition:
>             "Not for arguing about what FreeBSD is or where it should go."
>           (developers on current@ etc, are unpaid, & advocacy@ people
>           have no right to direct what FreeBSD is & will be.)

I think its hould be slightly more openly worded - for example,
discussions (i mean rational discussions with technical details) of
what FreeBSD is may be in some warranted - consider for example
producing materials to promote the use of FreeBSD in embedded systems
or similar.

> 
> -
> Julian Stacey        Net & Sys Eng Consultant, Munich       http://berklix.com
> Mail in Ascii (Html=Spam).  Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz.
>