From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Sep 21 9: 9:57 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.sunesi.net (ns1.sunesi.net [196.15.192.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B3C37B423; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 09:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbm by ns1.sunesi.net with local (Exim 3.03 #1) id 13c7N7-0003t7-00; Thu, 21 Sep 2000 16:30:45 +0200 Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2000 16:30:45 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner To: Stijn Hoop Cc: Donn Miller , current@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, marcel@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: buildkernel broken? Message-ID: <20000921163045.A14925@mithrandr.moria.org> References: <20000921145439.A13769@mithrandr.moria.org> <20000921162714.A61894@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20000921162714.A61894@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>; from stijn@win.tue.nl on Thu, Sep 21, 2000 at 04:27:14PM +0200 Organization: Sunesi Clinical Systems X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-RELEASE i386 X-URL: http://rucus.ru.ac.za/~nbm/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu 2000-09-21 (16:27), Stijn Hoop wrote: > nm: could not exec elf/nm in /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/libexec: No such file or directory Yep, this is the problem. > Which is quite correct since I blew away /usr/obj after my last buildworld > (FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE #0: Wed Sep 13 14:45:31 CEST 2000). Is this a problem? Yep. > Should I have done a buildworld before a buildkernel now? I'm trying to convince Marcel that since we already let you use gcc from out the tree, there's no reason we should prevent people from running 'nm' from out the tree. Since he knows more about this sort of thing, and says there may be a problem, I'll leave it to him. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner Sunesi Clinical Systems nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message