From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 27 18:18:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CA21065692 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:18:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F148FC41 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:18:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1790 invoked by uid 399); 27 Aug 2009 18:18:51 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 27 Aug 2009 18:18:51 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4A96CE01.3010904@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 11:18:41 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek References: <200908251907.n7PJ7QiO036868@svn.freebsd.org> <20090825194258.GB1471@tops> <20090826101953.GC3055@garage.freebsd.pl> <4A959020.4040606@FreeBSD.org> <20090827135526.GI1752@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <20090827135526.GI1752@garage.freebsd.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Gleb Kurtsou , src-committers@freebsd.org, Xin LI , svn-src-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r196550 - in head: etc/defaults etc/rc.d share/man/man5 X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:18:55 -0000 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > But giving multiple tools to accomplish the same thing might confuse our > users, so its probably not worth it. The proposed solution is good enough. That was the primary focus of my initial concern but enough people have chimed in saying that this would be useful that I have no objections to adding support for 'arp -f' if there is someone who wants to do the work. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection