From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Fri Aug 5 03:41:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582DDBAFE47 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 03:41:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 286951575 for ; Fri, 5 Aug 2016 03:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u753evtK045260 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 4 Aug 2016 21:40:58 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id u753evbp045257; Thu, 4 Aug 2016 21:40:57 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2016 21:40:57 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Kevin Oberman cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Subject: Re: vt(4) issues on 11.0-BETA3 (Actually 11-STABLE) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 04 Aug 2016 21:40:58 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2016 03:41:00 -0000 On Thu, 4 Aug 2016, Kevin Oberman wrote: > 3. After one port erred on the build, I scrolled back to select the list of > ports still to be built (a portmaster(8) feature) and try to paste it into > the same window or a different one. I get a totally different region. Since > the list spanned several lines due to line wrap, I got a bunch of other > lines, no doubt from some other part of the buffer. I have a hunch that > this is tied to the fact that a great many lines of output get wrapped into > multiple lines on the display and the arithmetic of what is selected goes > awry. (Just a guess, though.) Yes. I submitted a patch to have portmaster save the output also to a file in /tmp because of this. It's not in the latest port, I think. I'd attach it, but it's on a machine that is under some books and a failed hard drive awaiting shipment.