From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 28 02:42:21 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780CB1065674 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (ZIM.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363BC8FC1C for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n3S2gkpU012945 for ; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:42:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.3/8.14.2/Submit) id n3S2gkZ5012944 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:42:46 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:42:46 -0400 From: David Schultz To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20090428024246.GA12887@zim.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <20090427183836.GA10793@zim.MIT.EDU> <49F5FE45.2090101@freebsd.org> <20090427193326.GA7654@britannica.bec.de> <20090427194904.GA11137@zim.MIT.EDU> <20090427200821.GA6665@britannica.bec.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090427200821.GA6665@britannica.bec.de> Cc: Subject: Re: SoC 2009: BSD-licensed libiconv in base system X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:42:21 -0000 On Mon, Apr 27, 2009, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 03:49:04PM -0400, David Schultz wrote: > > ...but isn't this moot at present because there are no > > widely-accepted encodings that include characters that > > aren't supported by UCS-4? Citrus doesn't seem to support > > any such encodings in any case. > > "Just" using UCS-4 not necessarily buys you the desired affect. > Keep in mind that UCS-4 is still a variable width encoding, as soon as > you factor combining characters and some other interesting parts in. This is true, but unfortunately C99 wasn't really designed to support combining characters. I don't understand how this relates to the present discussion.