From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Fri Mar 11 23:49:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56636ACD5E5 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:49:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vk0-x235.google.com (mail-vk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14DBA382 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:49:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id e185so152679440vkb.1 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:49:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=M3BhR8dbZUz+TmcvtiZendiTIf7FmpJtfGGJlUnSS6c=; b=1DDPOE1Wqzs0gOtHvoRPSfIPo3eOE91RdUd0aOHhcbdoxBxAjT/QBsWlXSSh7Ta6eg OHF3O2RgYNqFWLjqBhnKMJQs0kTTDijKm8S9B70bM8ZISzfrhQSK3ojKvT3jWd6IqV63 NG8eVYjyiLidGulcwjoBawbnx3WVUd+mVN4y2d54XjKQpJK3RvX/K9I5Ocu0YBfm3pjW j9V8i0uI3NTPXxkyKoPlGsTOSdhTsNHq1/8jzUX1HYvRKUOtHWQvRNd4sLFo4TwgsKLL /XK+aemZazA5Yrr/iaQmeq7aWfTYQQcztLU6zz1ayJlt6IpLb19nULK0ZE6grCuULsLQ dnVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=M3BhR8dbZUz+TmcvtiZendiTIf7FmpJtfGGJlUnSS6c=; b=S3BXSlo7WYs11zl/elYrx1jtJhCwp9bhUqp8iH2m1ZPfFclm09HfqypJWiIEohW2h9 tG7vmvuialLYmk8hgSw2MS/RX8FVTH3H5W1eV7qwNnnoZMruMimkvtD+ci8G6k4iZ/Kq ufjtE0Rn8LxmZW8n1IhDuE+nI1qlIZl1KDx93AwqiaQGN/+PudaW1uiJPYv/rIrfGfpb zAhehl8jgIxzfdGV5sfZrd4kcQp2+kvF9MnN+8JdXx6+VgiyDZwow0Qt8qed5RVH7tuJ KFfP0aeqZ/QljuisIYRHH2wXMqrE/8c0ZKI60sMq2u9haxb+0pN4stKjn9tEY8PK2jNq T3MA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIh9pczdcK3mJLaEy9a4s3VdrpU0rKGvFhICblna3EpGnpMcTbYgdD/fdyfDnVfbgD5LSWVgw1tAW0AXg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.31.178.146 with SMTP id b140mr12568707vkf.108.1457740159112; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:49:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.31.194.194 with HTTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2016 15:49:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 18:49:19 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Significant performance hit on recent upgrade From: Ultima To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2016 23:49:20 -0000 Hello, Recently I upgraded to r296377, and notice a big hit in performance. This system in question is a poudriere building system that usually has many jails running building around 200-400 pkg per hour for each jail. After the upgrade, it is rare to see over 100 pkg per hour built. Possible regression on recent commit? Previously was running (sorry had git src at the time) 8b372d1(master) built around a week ago. Any ideas what maybe causing this? I can provide more details if needed, someone in irc also mentioned noticing a hit in performance. Ultima