From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Jan 10 19:35:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id TAA23995 for doc-outgoing; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 19:35:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (fallout.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id TAA23990 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 19:35:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (jfieber@localhost) by fallout.campusview.indiana.edu (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id WAA14872; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 22:35:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 1997 22:35:29 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber To: Sean Kelly cc: doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: ANNOUNCE: DocBook V3.0 released] In-Reply-To: <32D6BDDF.176F@fsl.noaa.gov> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY=------------6D34307F1B6 Content-ID: Sender: owner-doc@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --------------6D34307F1B6 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Content-ID: On Fri, 10 Jan 1997, Sean Kelly wrote: > Many of you probably saw this already ... so ignore this message. :-) ...and just after I brought in 2.4.1. :( I've been pondering whether or not to support multiple versions and have pretty much decided against it at this point because in most cases, the incompatible changes are pretty minor and highly unlikely to cause problems. Thus, "upgrading" the docs is simply a matter of changing the doctype declaration. Opinions? Also, any cvs wizards want to explain the preferred way to lay a new version of something over an older version? -john --------------6D34307F1B6--