From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 2 12:13:08 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA15018 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 2 Sep 1998 12:13:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from tor-dev1.nbc.netcom.ca (tor-dev1.nbc.netcom.ca [207.181.89.12]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA15013 for ; Wed, 2 Sep 1998 12:13:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from taob@tor-dev1.nbc.netcom.ca) Received: (from taob@localhost) by tor-dev1.nbc.netcom.ca (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA02435; Wed, 2 Sep 1998 15:11:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 2 Sep 1998 15:11:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Brian Tao X-Sender: taob@tor-dev1.nbc.netcom.ca To: John Polstra cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why no ldconfig for ELF? In-Reply-To: <199809021600.JAA22787@austin.polstra.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 2 Sep 1998, John Polstra wrote: > > You specify the search path at _link_ time with LD_RUN_PATH or the > "-R" linker option. The path is saved in the executable or shared > library itself. That's assuming you have the ability to relink the executable... if not, is LD_LIBRARY_PATH the only run-time recourse? -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob@risc.org) "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message