From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Apr 5 03:50:43 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA03148 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 5 Apr 1997 03:50:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from dg-rtp.dg.com (dg-rtp.rtp.dg.com [128.222.1.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA03118 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 1997 03:50:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by dg-rtp.dg.com (5.4R3.10/dg-rtp-v02) id AA19608; Sat, 5 Apr 1997 06:50:08 -0500 Received: from ponds by dg-rtp.dg.com.rtp.dg.com; Sat, 5 Apr 1997 06:50 EST Received: from lakes.water.net (lakes [10.0.0.3]) by ponds.water.net (8.8.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA22055; Sat, 5 Apr 1997 06:30:02 -0500 (EST) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.water.net (8.8.3/8.6.9) id GAA17475; Sat, 5 Apr 1997 06:36:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 5 Apr 1997 06:36:00 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199704051136.GAA17475@lakes.water.net> To: ponds!time.cdrom.com!jhk Subject: Re: Some significant (daresay serious) problems with 2.2.1 install & keyboard Cc: ponds!freebsd.org!hackers Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > > I'm using the 2.2.1-RELEASE from ftp.freebsd.org; with the > > boot.flp found in floppies/newer. [There is no checksum there, > > so I have no way of validating my copy...] > > And I assume that the "older" boot.flp does the same thing on this > 386? I'm just trying to establish an effective timeframe for the > breakage. Thanks! I just checked; it seems the "older" boot.flp works fine. So, the problem must have been introduced between "older" and "newer." :-) - Dave Rivers - > > Jordan