From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jan 3 17:50:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A3F37B419 for ; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:50:05 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g041o5A14800; Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:50:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 17:50:05 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200201040150.g041o5A14800@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: "David W. Chapman Jr." Subject: Re: ports/33521: mozilla port doesn't build irc client ChatZilla Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/33521; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: "Steve Wills" Cc: Subject: Re: ports/33521: mozilla port doesn't build irc client ChatZilla Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 19:49:14 -0600 > Thats fine with me, I can add it to my pkgtools.conf file to always pass that > flag, so its not big deal. However, according to the mozilla developers, > chatzilla is nothing more than about 78k of JavaScript and XUL. From my > experience, it doesn't add a great deal of time to the build or the on disk or > in memory images. Whats your reasoning behind making it optional? > I wasn't aware that it was that small. Eventhough some people still might want it an option instead of default, since its not a default in the first place. Actually you could add it to your /etc/make.conf so that anytime you build it from wherever it would use those knobs. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message