From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Nov 15 16:39:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA00143
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 16:39:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA00132
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 16:39:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.cdsnet.net (mail.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.5])
          by mail.cdsnet.net (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id QAA16182
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 16:38:57 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 1996 16:38:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Jaye Mathisen  <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: IRQ sharing on PCI?
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.961115163716.2837T-100000@mail.cdsnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk



Do we support this?

I noticed on 1 of my boxes when I rebooted it the following:

tible display device> rev 76 int a irq 11 on pci0:8
de0 <Digital DC21140 Fast Ethernet> rev 18 int a irq 11 on pci0:9
de0: DC21140 [10-100Mb/s] pass 1.2 Ethernet address 00:00:c0:4b:10:ed
de0: enabling 10baseT UTP port
ahc0 <Adaptec 2940 SCSI host adapter> rev 0 int a irq 11 on pci0:11


Notice that they're all IRQ11, which I thought seemed odd.

None of my other Pentiums do it, they all get different IRQ's.

Anyway, any idea appreciated, I suppose it's entirely possible that it's
just a reporting problem, as opposed to anything actually wrong.