From owner-freebsd-security Tue Jun 1 7:10:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (unknown [206.67.97.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BAE14CA8; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 07:08:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost (billf@localhost) by jade.chc-chimes.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id KAA19516; Tue, 1 Jun 1999 10:08:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 10:08:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: 0x1c Cc: Kris Kennaway , Eivind Eklund , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: auditors In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, 0x1c wrote: > Well, fixes can be submitted, but it's no use unless they are implemented. > A large number of OpenBSD patches/fixes implement non-standard behaviour, > which often appear to be frowned upon by committers. At minimum these > should be considered if an option is given to revert to the historical > behaviour. Definatly. I'm just looking for fixes, not changes. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message