Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 10:08:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola <billf@jade.chc-chimes.com> To: 0x1c <nick@feralmonkey.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au>, Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: auditors Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990601100821.18609A-100000@jade.chc-chimes.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906011604440.10887-100000@shibumi.feralmonkey.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 1 Jun 1999, 0x1c wrote: > Well, fixes can be submitted, but it's no use unless they are implemented. > A large number of OpenBSD patches/fixes implement non-standard behaviour, > which often appear to be frowned upon by committers. At minimum these > should be considered if an option is given to revert to the historical > behaviour. Definatly. I'm just looking for fixes, not changes. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.990601100821.18609A-100000>