Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 26 Nov 2000 22:27:12 -0600 (CST)
From:      James Wyatt <jwyatt@rwsystems.net>
To:        Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
Cc:        Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: NATD: failed to write packet back (Permission denied)
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.10.10011262225220.96015-100000@bsdie.rwsystems.net>
In-Reply-To: <200011270130.UAA88239@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 26 Nov 2000, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> <<On Sun, 26 Nov 2000 14:19:07 -0800, Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.ORG> said:
> > But that's for my private home network. I trust myself to only send out
> > useful, productive packets. :)
> 
> I must admit to being puzzled by home firewalls, at least among this
> group of people.  If you've got some promiscuous operating system from
> Washington State running, I can somewhat understand doing that.  If
> you just have a single machine, which is under your direct control,
> then doing packet filtering is just silly.  If your machine is
> properly configured and secured, filtering out packets which would
> otherwise be thrown away anyway serves no useful purpose.  (If the
	[ ... ]

Some of us set our home networks (really small office) to use this stuff
so that when we build a "real" (for money and protecting another company)
we know how everything operates and have something to compare to should
something not work the way we expect. - Jy@



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.10011262225220.96015-100000>