From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Feb 29 09:56:17 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA25840
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:56:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA25834
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:56:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.4/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA03182; Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:56:07 -0800 (PST)
To: Dave Andersen <angio@aros.net>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 100-baseT hub recommendation? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 29 Feb 1996 02:15:41 MST."
             <199602290915.CAA19896@terra.aros.net> 
Date: Thu, 29 Feb 1996 09:56:07 -0800
Message-ID: <3180.825616567@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> On a related note, we've been purchasing SMC Etherpower 10/100's for our 
> new FreeBSD boxes in preparation for upgrading a hub to 100baseT, but my 

Erm.  I think I'd really stick to the SMCs.  Even if the Intel cards
work 100% out of the box, there's the slight matter of driver testing.
The de0 driver has been tested to death, the Intel one not (it's new,
whaddaya expect?)

Oh, and as to hubs, the Grand Junction product (now part of Cisco) seems
to work just fine for us.

						Jordan