From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 25 12:49:35 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40FE516A409 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:49:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17D6113C4AE for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:49:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from vanquish.pgh.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 658B6EBC7C; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:49:34 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 08:49:27 -0400 From: Bill Moran To: RW Message-Id: <20070425084927.3e57c771.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <20070425130018.6a2ca17f@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <01d301c78699$d6a36820$0300020a@mickey> <20070425130018.6a2ca17f@gumby.homeunix.com.> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.3.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Memory >3.5GB not used? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 12:49:35 -0000 In response to RW : > On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 10:56:09 -0700 > "Don O'Neil" wrote: > > > I just built a new server with an Athlon 64 x2, > > > > >... > > > > What if I want to install more than 4GB? This mobo supports up to 16 > > GB... Do I need to go to the AMD64 platform to get >4GB? > > AFAIK all the reasons for staying 32-bit are specific to desktop > software - I don't think there is any reason not to go to AMD64. I'll second that. We've got a lot of amd64 systems here. The only ones we've had problems with are desktop applications. Every server application we've dealt with has worked perfectly under amd64. -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com