From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec  5 17:16:14 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EB0106566C;
	Mon,  5 Dec 2011 17:16:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from lichray@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946DD8FC15;
	Mon,  5 Dec 2011 17:16:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by eekc1 with SMTP id c1so842567eek.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 09:16:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=cSdqso1/h+8HkrNsOlIIUMHqVqhdsUQ0F/03/ygbgkM=;
	b=P8Q/+qu5exMvguuQrUfAMY8KSOhqCmXgXEZwoNB+D2PEIMn2fgt3JEYwL9EhZCoT4e
	Ko7K7X7q04zk3fG/aX8x7iG53Kwuc1gG8BdmuD26TFAUAh1MD66zO+QEnnQ4nub+I3ZY
	p1OsIs6r0jXhmATst73ZxD6A4KrIHGMlBEAB0=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.6.12 with SMTP id 12mr730542eem.51.1323105372152; Mon, 05
	Dec 2011 09:16:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.47.194 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 09:16:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.47.194 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 09:16:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20111205161505.GA11748@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
References: <CAGsORuAz--GVpiEkgnYJccqCESx2CJ12peFDk_JetfFj6kQqGw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111115233614.22d3984e@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
	<CAGsORuA+30wQ0QedeW9KzrM8QAenR=sXfhU+iVF5GQVH_4FR3A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGsORuAFnGQAub4h7dEo+0Y78RBwBuNfs78Cb5Z37SvYcieEmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111205072833.GA3145@lonesome.com>
	<20111205161505.GA11748@lor.one-eyed-alien.net>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 11:16:12 -0600
Message-ID: <CAGsORuDjQOX2iM0HtKND8JHHXrHctQsSeurdO4OOVcnMFwpdFg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zhihao Yuan <lichray@gmail.com>
To: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5
Cc: Wen Heping <wen@freebsd.org>, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>,
	Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@freebsd.org>,
	FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, portmgr@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Plan to add a bsd.pure.mk
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 17:16:14 -0000

No, we don't need it that to upgrade llvm, but I need to decide soon.

--
Zhihao Yuan
On Dec 5, 2011 10:16 AM, "Brooks Davis" <brooks@freebsd.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 01:28:33AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > I would like to hold off on any more disruptive changes to the tree
> > until we can get this release out the door.  If that means devel/clang
> > needs to stay at its current value (and only clang-devel updated), then
> > that's fine.
>
> We don't actually need to add a bsd.pure.mk to upgrade llvm.  We would
> need to complete the repocopy in ports/163030 and change the build and
> run depends in lang/pure which would change the depends of the 12ish
> ports involved.  Similar changes are needed in a couple other ports.
>
> I'll leave it up to portmgr to decide if that's too disruptive.  IMO if
> any change of this scope (an upgrade triggering less than dozen rebuilds,
> mostly of ports that aren't widely used) should be approved, it should
> be this one given our general toolchain focus.
>
> -- Brooks
>