From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 5 10:53:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAA091065670; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remko@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailgate.jr-hosting.nl (mailgate.jr-hosting.nl [78.46.126.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E9C8FC16; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 10:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from websrv01.jr-hosting.nl (websrv01 [78.47.69.233]) by mailgate.jr-hosting.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B4E1CC38; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:35:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from www by websrv01.jr-hosting.nl with local (Exim 4.71 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1NS6lQ-000KGF-Mg; Tue, 05 Jan 2010 11:35:48 +0100 Received: from 192.58.226.100 (SquirrelMail authenticated user remko) by www.jr-hosting.nl with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:35:48 +0100 Message-ID: <0f8c4a9c3740e2185582ef1c922835b3.squirrel@www.jr-hosting.nl> In-Reply-To: <20100105112447.00005e71@unknown> References: <20091207080353.66241t4vpmnmrilc@webmail.leidinger.net> <20100105112447.00005e71@unknown> Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2010 11:35:48 +0100 From: "Remko Lodder" To: "Alexander Leidinger" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: jail@freebsd.org, remko@freebsd.org, simon@FreeBSd.org Subject: Re: starting jails in the background & dependencies X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2010 10:53:15 -0000 On Tue, January 5, 2010 11:24 am, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 08:03:53 +0100 Alexander Leidinger > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> now that jails are started in the background (which is good, to > > I just realized yesterday that it also stops in parallel (in the > background). This is bad. It may be the case that a jail is not fully > stopped via the rc scripts when the OS decides to kill the remaining > processes during a shutdown. > > My first reaction is to only allow to start in the background, but > everything else needs to be serialized. > > Any objections or better ideas out there? > > Bye, > Alexander. > I think the best way at this moment is to revert the change ( I can do that , or someone else, I dont mind ) and think of a better concept. Simon also mentioned that he didn't like the current way of doing things, so I kept it in, for possible suggestions. Reverting the change would mean that the old behaviour at least works and is with what people are used to. We can then further improve it where needed. Cheerio, Remko -- /"\ Best regards, | remko@FreeBSD.org \ / Remko Lodder | remko@EFnet X http://www.evilcoder.org/ | / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News