From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec  5 14:21:28 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D672C16A419
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed,  5 Dec 2007 14:21:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net
	[66.92.78.145])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A967D13C448
	for <questions@freebsd.org>; Wed,  5 Dec 2007 14:21:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org)
Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147)
	id C1ABA28457; Wed,  5 Dec 2007 09:06:13 -0500 (EST)
To: "Dan Mahoney\, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org>
References: <20071205013053.I89093@prime.gushi.org>
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 09:06:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20071205013053.I89093@prime.gushi.org> (Dan Mahoney's message of
	"Wed\, 5 Dec 2007 01\:32\:39 -0500 \(EST\)")
Message-ID: <44tzmx5j8q.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.99 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Maybe this is a bug, should I report it?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:21:28 -0000

"Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org> writes:

> But why is it that portupgrade feels the need to upgrade gpg to gpg2,
> when gpg is still in the tree?
>
> I'm running a portupgrade -rf gettext, and didn't previously have gpg2
> installed.

security/gnupg is gpg2, and has been for about a year.  
gpg1 is now a separate port, and you need to make separate
arrangements if you want to start using security/gnupg1 instead of
security/gnupg.  portupgrade has a "-o" option for this purpose.