From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 03:18:47 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1913716A41C for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 03:18:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07D243D1D for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 03:18:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@natserv.com) Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147]) by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4V3IguQ010591; Mon, 30 May 2005 23:18:42 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 23:18:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Francisco Reyes X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net To: ray@redshift.com In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.20050530175629.00a77268@pop.redshift.com> Message-ID: <20050530231640.T58656@zoraida.natserv.net> References: <3.0.1.32.20050530175629.00a77268@pop.redshift.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Faster? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 03:18:47 -0000 On Mon, 30 May 2005 ray@redshift.com wrote: > Depends on what you are doing. All the reports I have read from several lists, including some non FreeBSD ones, seems to show AMD64 doing significantly better on data intensive operations. In a PostgreSQL list I read reports of 1.5 to 2.0 times the performance of Intel CPU of the same speed.