From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 18 21:38:07 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED8516A403
	for <freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:38:07 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gofdpo-freebsd-openoffice@m.gmane.org)
Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B522943D55
	for <freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:38:06 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from gofdpo-freebsd-openoffice@m.gmane.org)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GPQo8-00086k-Ji
	for freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 23:37:40 +0200
Received: from p548fee66.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.143.238.102])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 23:37:40 +0200
Received: from rotkap by p548fee66.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1
	(Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 23:37:40 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
From: Heino Tiedemann <rotkaps_spam_trap@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 23:36:49 +0200
Organization: yes
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <h4g3u3-tp1.ln1@news.t-online.com>
References: <p2b0u3-ui41.ln1@news.t-online.com>
	<200609171720.59091.nb_root@videotron.ca>
	<i473u3-2c1.ln1@news.t-online.com>
	<200609181516.05432.nb_root@videotron.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p548fee66.dip.t-dialin.net
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (berkeley-unix)
X-Face: v6Lci{Mw=kwHf$`7C?L-U#BHn7O\wqF-1qg#Vk%}nUQv\i^mM/.p=wU+cr)yXf#Ob+foOOxW;
	ir"QI!|25wG3`ywF)yh~@V.kKtr.qp+v.R;
	w?c@ZzM#!'/7r_+)$NjMN:]qo-]`&z~KlP}|cERO'%s9":6\ZnN/O<ei}J0Al]3)bYC0sX=\5Uhc4T"RML'B}1DD*<ilY<p'63eq*36`tQ6c&cZ!,#l9s;
	m$dW
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: Why there is a newer OOo port than the binary?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: rotkap@gmx.de
List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD <freebsd-openoffice.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-openoffice>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-openoffice>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-openoffice-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 21:38:07 -0000

Nicolas Blais <nb_root@videotron.ca> wrote:

>> Okay, I Understand.
>>
>> But, it is not good, to put rel-candidates into the stable tree.
>> Maybe another port subtree is the solution? At least your explanation
>> sounds like..
>>
>> Maybe
>>
>> editors/openoffice.org-2.0-rc OR
>> editors/openoffice.org-2.0-milestones
>>
>> Please anderstand also my point of view: I never can do "portupgrade
>> -a", because of the "outdated" OOo-Port (I do not like to kompile
>> OOo. It takes to much time, and several times it has failed).
>>
>> Heino
>
> I don't like compiling OO either :)

But you do ;-)

> Have you tried the -x option ? You can portupgrade everything but exclude 
> openoffice like so:
>
> portupgrade -avx openoffice

Oh, cool.

My port is named "de-openoffice..." so thats the name for the -x
option?

Heino