Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 17:01:06 +0100 From: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> To: Paul Seniura <pdseniura@techie.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I believe lang/icc* are not open-source nor 'free', right? Message-ID: <20040319170106.31cf06de@Magellan.Leidinger.net> In-Reply-To: <20040319015159.0B9C011E734@scifi.homeip.net> References: <200403122136.i2CLaCm9096276@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040318213442.D38635C35@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> <p0602043abc7fca5da6c6@[128.113.24.47]> <20040319015159.0B9C011E734@scifi.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 19:51:59 -0600 (CST)
"Paul Seniura" <pdseniura@techie.com> wrote:
> The discussions on cvs-src list were almost making me
> panic, so I had to say something quick from another
> perspective. My previous msg has header lines pointing to
> the beginning of that thread, starting with the commits to
> allow building kernel with icc. Seems the other
> respondents here haven't taken time to read them to
> understand where I'm coming from. They are/were actually
> considering publicly distributing kernels built with icc --
> something we are not privvy to use, as I understand the
> license, and so must be clearly marked.
We are _allowed_ to distribute binaries compiled with icc. If this will
happen or not is open, as we're not able to compile a release with icc
yet.
If we ever provide a release (or anything else) which is compiled with
icc, it will be provided _addidionally_ to a gcc compiled release.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
I will be available to get hired in April 2004.
http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net
GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040319170106.31cf06de>