From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 24 06:07:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E899916A4CE for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 06:07:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from amsfep19-int.chello.nl (amsfep19-int.chello.nl [213.46.243.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACED43D49 for ; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 06:07:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from palle.girgensohn.se ([213.89.138.245]) by amsfep19-int.chello.nlESMTP <20040124140705.OQDT1965.amsfep19-int.chello.nl@palle.girgensohn.se>; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:07:05 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palle.girgensohn.se (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i0OE74Fp070961; Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:07:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 15:07:04 +0100 From: Palle Girgensohn To: delphij@delphij.net Message-ID: <67870000.1074953224@palle.girgensohn.se> In-Reply-To: <20040124140425.7479611456@beastie.frontfree.net> References: <20040124140425.7479611456@beastie.frontfree.net> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.0 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: gcc 3.x & fbsd 4.9? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 14:07:20 -0000 --On l=F6rdag, januari 24, 2004 22.04.31 +0800 Xin LI = =20 wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Palle Girgensohn >> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 9:51 PM >> To: gerald@FreeBSD.org >> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org >> Subject: gcc 3.x & fbsd 4.9? >> >> version name. Perhaps this is alright, 3.3.3-"current" is >> perhaps more stable than 3.3.2-release? > > I believe so. The 3.3.3-"CURRENT" has fixed a number of serious bugs, > especially, optimizer bugs in 3.3.2, and the snapshot chosen for the port > should be much more stable than 3.3.2-RELEASE. I think that's the reason > why there's no gcc 3.3.2 port. AFAIK, gcc 3.4.0 is planned to be released > in the near future, and 3.3.x is somewhat "STABLE" branch in gcc's > notation. Cool, that's what I expected. Thanks for the input! /Palle