Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 08:20:04 -0700 From: pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com> To: Alwin Doss <alwindoss@outlook.com> Cc: "freebsd-database@freebsd.org" <freebsd-database@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD's very own desktop environment Message-ID: <CAGBmCT5Hux=pkgTEcpBym5aqdO8SqmM1kwy6Kz=AMmgv1pVCtw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BAY002-W16768FCDE9171D61FF3643AA890@phx.gbl> References: <BAY002-W16768FCDE9171D61FF3643AA890@phx.gbl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:50 AM, Alwin Doss <alwindoss@outlook.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > Having a good weekend??? Let me not make it boring I will get straight to the point. > > I have read in FreeBSD documentation, while comparing with the Linux kernel we claim FreeBSD to be a complete operating system which provides not just the kernel but also other utilies surrounding the kernel making it a complete operating system. > My question is "Why doesn't FreeBSD have it's own desktop environment" something like what Ubuntu Linux is trying to achieve with their Unity Desktop environment. > In doing so we will carve a niche for ourselves in the end user space. > > What does the forum have to say about this? http://www.pcbsd.org/ -p -- pete wright www.nycbug.org @nomadlogicLA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGBmCT5Hux=pkgTEcpBym5aqdO8SqmM1kwy6Kz=AMmgv1pVCtw>